English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this study is to evaluate hospital management indicator progress, analyzing the indicator and also described M Hospital management indicators. This study is using mix method design with explanatory sequential. Participants consist of the pharmacist, the head of the medical record unit, clinical risk management and patient safety committee, the head of a radiology unit, inpatient, permanent staff of the hospital, and the head of financial officer hospital management. Overall, the data showed that M Hospital’s indicator hasn’t completely matched it’s agreed on an element.  Nine newly researched indicators were proposals from each unit. However, the indicator understudy remains relevant for measuring the needs of this hospital in order to improve the quality of patient care and safety.

Achievement Analysis and Evaluation of a Hospital in Yogyakarta