English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Le prologue de Gargantua est assez generalement considere comme un pacte de lecture essentiel, dont la validite s’etend a l’ensemble des chroniques rabelaisiennes. Il est souvent allegue par la critique litteraire a l’appui de ses reflexions theoriques. Mais ce pacte est si peu clair qu’il a suscite des debats passionnes quant a sa signification. La presente etude se propose d’apporter une resolution de type logique, grammatical et historique a la querelle qui oppose depuis quelques decennies les tenants d’un sens univoque aux champions de la polysemie.AbstractThe prologue to Gargantua is quite unanimously considered as an important reading pact which can apply to all the various chronicles written by Rabelais. Moreover, this prologue is often put forward by literary critics to buttress their theories. But it is so abstruse that its exegesis has fuelled heated debates. My purpose here is to settle the controversy that has been raging for a few decades between the supporters of a univocal interpretation and the champions of polysemy, using logical, grammatical and historical arguments.

Pour en finir avec le prologue de <em>Gargantua</em> !