English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this article is to analyze the cases in which the personal presence of one of the parties in the trial was not physical or juridically posible, which is an exception to the rule of the irreceivability of the direct representation in the procedure of the legis actiones as shown by Iustinian in the Institutions (4. 10 pr.). We also deal with the polemical doctrinal subject of the existence of the cognitor in the first procedure used in Rome, such as we maintain, as well as the scope of operation. In all the previous cases, the judicial intervention of the representative is free. PALABRAS CLAVES-

La gratuidad de la actuación judicial de los representantes en el sistema de las legis actiones