English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article studies the opinions of Indiana Supreme Court Justice Brent E. Dickson in three cases in which he interpreted and applied several of the seven religion provisions of the Indiana Constitution. His opinions in these cases provide insight into the Indiana Supreme Court's and his method of constitutional interpretation, and they explicate the meaning of several of Indiana's religion provisions. This study develops in several steps. First, it discusses the three Indiana Supreme Court cases. Second, it explores the court's method of state constitutional interpretation, which Justice Dickson helped to bring into sharper focus. Third, it analyzes his interpretation of several religion provisions in these cases. Fourth, it concludes with some observations regarding his careful application of the court's interpretive method and key features of the court's religion provisions jurisprudence.

Justice Brent E. Dickson, State Constitutional Interpretation, and the Religion Provisions of the Indiana Constitution