English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background and Hypothesis: The COVID-19 pandemic has likely made remote consultation (RC) a permanent part of healthcare. Older adults could greatly benefit from RC, and current literature indicates older adults are equally satisfied with RC vs. face to face consultation (FTFC). However, there is selection bias in the literature towards adults who feel comfortable enrolling in a technology study. We hope to fill this dearth by surveying diabetic older adults who were strongly encouraged by their physicians to utilize RC during the COVID-19 quarantine. We hypothesize older adults will be less satisfied by RC vs. FTFC.

Are Diabetic Older Adults Equally Satisfied with Remote Consultation vs. Face to Face Consultation?