English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

COMMERCIAL CONTEXT 255 A. Common Law Rule: Covenants Not to Compete Are Per Se Invalid  256 B. Modern "Rule of Reason": Non-Compete Agreements Are Enforceable if Reasonable  256 C. Indiana's Approach: The "Rule of Reason"  257 ffi. PHYSICIAN EMPLOYEE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS  258 A. Approaches to the Problem  258 1. Modern Commercial "Rule of Reason"  258 2. Rule of Per Se Invalidity  259 3. Intermediate Approach: A Stricter Application of the "Rule of Reason"  261 B. Development of the Standards for Reviewing Physician NonCompete Agreements in Indiana  263 IV. ANALYSIS: PROPOSAL FOR A MORE DEMANDING REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS  267 A. Determine the Genuinely Legitimate, Protectable Interests of Medical Practice Groups  267 B. Full Consideration of Public Interests Affected by Physician Non-Competes  268 1. Public Interests Favoring Enforcement  269 2. Public Interests Disfavoring Enforcement  271 C. The Circumstances Surrounding the Physician's Departure ... 281 1. Voluntary Resignation or Termination for Cause  282 2. Bad Faith Termination  283 3. Good Faith Termination Without Cause  284 D. Consideration of the Remedy Sought  285 1. Liquidated Damages  286 2. Injunctive Relief'.  286

Physician Employee Non-Compete Agreements on the Examining Table: The Need to Better Protect Patients' and the Public's Interests in Indiana