English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolEl derecho al acceso a la justicia es una precondicion basica para la operatividad del resto de los derechos fundamentales. Sin embargo, no pocas veces ese derecho ha sido interpretado de una manera tal que ha implicado la expansion de practicas judiciales activistas. Frente a ello, el examen de la influencia de la interpretacion del derecho al acceso a la justicia sobre el activismo judicial que acometera este trabajo requiere, en primer lugar, esclarecer el sentido de ambos conceptos. Posteriormente se formularan las bases de una interpretacion razonable que concilie la concrecion del acceso a la justicia con la efectiva vigencia de los bienes o valores comprometidos o en riesgo ante practicas judiciales activistas; es decir, la division de poderes y el sistema de pesos y contrapesos. EnglishThe right of access to justice is a structural precondition for actual enforcement of other basic rights. However, many times, that right actually had been interpreted in order to expand of judicial activism. Before that, an evaluation on the influence of interpretation of the right of access to justice entails to elucidate the meaning of both concepts. This article, indeed, will aim firstly at that goal. After that, I will propose the grounds for a reasonable interpretation that will harmonize the instantiation of access to justice with an actual effectiveness of constitutional goods or values compromised – or at risk – through activist judicial practices; that is, separation of powers and the system of check and balances.

¿Puede la expansión del derecho al acceso a la justicia potenciar al activismo judicial?