English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This dissertation intends to demonstrate that traditional just causes (fulfillment of legal duty, due obedience, justifying state of need, legitimate defense, full exercise of rights, public charge or lawful activity) are, in fact, forms of “acceptable risk”. So, they must be examined within the field of objective imputation, as true atypical cause, instead of typical behavior lacking of illegality. Thus, and in view of the facts that harmfulness has been long considered a criterion of objective categorization, we are witnessing a definite drop of tripartite system of crime, whose long agony was only the chronicle of a foretold death. Such drop happens because the purpose, formerly fulfilled by the concept of illegality in the criminal justice system, has been satisfied today by the analytic criteria that structure objective imputation.

universidad libre ebooks

Causales de justificación y ausencia de lesividad como criterios negativos de imputación objetiva : una propuesta de ampliación del concepto riesgo permitido para la constitución de un esquema bipartito del delito