English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Perhaps the biggest obstacles to the effective implementation of the student-centred mathematics programs are mistakes. So it is very important to know that not every mistake is the same and that the same type of feedback cannot be used in every mistake type. In this study, firstly 870 mistakes and feedback encountered by 4 teachers in 120 hours were analysed. Then, which feedback technique was used in which type of mistake according to Turkdogan’s clarification and discussed to what degree the feedback met the expectations of student-centred mathematics curricula. It was found that the use of the Ignoring the Mistake or Accepting it as Correct, Saying the True Answer and Saying the Answer is Wrong feedback techniques in the first type of mistake was more appropriate. The use of Creating Conflicts, Simplifying or Making Connections feedback techniques was insufficient. It is thought that organizing educational activities for teachers and teacher students about mistakes and feedbacks will be useful to establish a more effective student-centred environment.

The Relationship between Mistakes and Feedbacks Encountered in Mathematics Course in the 7th Grade