English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The division between major and minor arts, established in the 18th century, still remains in a great part of art historiography and has generated a distorted vision of reality. There is a generalised conscience of superiority of some arts above others, which are not called minor any more but that we are determined to put into the same muddle box for which we have not found a satisfactory label yet. Nevertheless, this was not the predominant criterion in the 16th century. That is why, in our paper, we try to remember and come closer to the knowledge of how the art of silver work was appreciated in 16th-century Spain, through a short analysis of how silversmiths were professionally valued on three different levels: the theoretical level, as shown in treatises; the juridical level, as shown in standard regulations and writs of execution gained in trials; and the level of the daily performance of their activity.

Escultores de oro y plata. En torno a la estimación del arte de la platería en España en el siglo XVI