English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolA traves de la aproximacion a la figura de la oralidad, vista desde el desarrollo de la actividad de administrar la justicia, en cabeza de la figura del juez, se estudian los principios de concentracion e inmediacion, como escenario juridico para la conservacion del derecho de defensa de las partes en un sistema de prelacion adversarial. Como propuesta argumentativa, se estableceran las incidencias del juez oral y su rol como tercero, ajeno a la controversia, en la pretension de correccion de balanceo o equilibrio en los intereses de las partes, las cuales acuden al aparato jurisdiccional del Estado como reclamacion; no solo en sentido formal, sino tambien como una nocion de justicia material desde la discrecionalidad judicial ante la vista oral del juez civil. Para ello se establecieron conexiones teoricas con herramientas conceptuales de la filosofia del derecho, aprehendidas necesariamente por la justicia procesal civil. EnglishThrough an approach to the oral figure, seen from the development of the activity of administering justice, headed by the figure of the judge, the principles of concentration and immediacy are studied as a legal scenario for the preservation of the right of defense of the parties in a system of adversarial preemption. As an argumentative proposal, the incidences of the oral judge and his role as a third party, alien to the controversy, will be established in the attempt to correct the balance or equilibrium in the interests of the parties, who turn to the jurisdictional apparatus of the State as a claim; not only in a formal sense, but also as a notion of material justice from the judicial discretion before the oral hearing of the civil judge. To this end, theoretical connections were established with conceptual tools of the philosophy of law, necessarily apprehended by civil procedural justice.

Juez discrecional y garantismo: Facultades de disposición del litigio en el Código General del Proceso