English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article is to prove that under the existing law creation of the public image of the civil servants may influence their atitude to employment relationship. The legislator did not point to any objective criteria which should be used to evaluate if a given person meets selection limits regarding unspotted character and flawless reputation. Thus personal rights are in relations with defined selection limits. In the article basic categories of personal rights whose infringement may influence evaluation of a public figure are presented. It is also shown what the protection of personal rights means and what kinds of claims a public figure whose personal rights have been infringed can have. Additionally, the influence of the infringement of personal rights may have on the person’s employment is discussed.

Selection Limits Defined in the Law vs Infringement of Personal Rights of Civil Servants