English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study attempts to present the issues of most important principles of judicial and administrative enforcement proceedings on a comparable basis. The authors discuss issues related to defining principles of the law against each of these procedures, indicate the criteria for distinguishing them and the role of the principles of law in making, interpreting and applying the law. Subsequently, problems of the lists of principles addressed in the doctrine of judicial and administrative enforcement proceedings were presented, stressing, at the same time, their individuality and specificity compared with other branches of the law. In the other part of the study the authors presented the analysis of the principle of dispositivness in court enforcement proceedings and the principle of compulsory initiation of administrative enforcement proceedings, and therefore, the principles that best illustrate the dissimilarity of rules governing the public and private law enforcement.

studia iuridica lublinensia

The Principle of Compulsory Initiation of Administrative Enforcement Proceedings and the Principle of Dispositivness in Court Enforcement Proceedings – Comparative Law Conceptualization