English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) was launched on 20 March 2003 to move the regime of Saddam and help Iraqi people to rebuild allegedly new Iraq. The outcomes of the operations show us that plans and preparations were done in a hasty mood with a lack of contingency plans. The role given to civilian agencies to work with new Baghdad regime in the post war era weren’t implemented successfully. The post war period’s desired endstates weren’t achieved as were planned theoretically. What were the assumptions of CENTCOM before the OPLAN 1003? On which bases did the counterinsurgency policy rely on? What was the reaction of Iraqi people against OIF army? How does this policy effect the desired endstate? The aim of this article is to reply the mentioned questions above. This paper seeks to show the weaknesses of counterinsurgency policy pursed in OIF and the measures taken in wake of the failure. Finally the lessons learnt are depicted and suggestions are given.   Keywords- Counterinsurgency; Iraq; Operation Iraqi Freedom; OPLAN 1003, Policy.

Counterinsurgency Policy in Phase IV of Operation Iraqi Freedom