English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Until the early 2000s, in Argentina and Brazil, in the face of the disproportion of state violence that killed thousands of militants and non-militants, several of the documentaries that address this issue focused on the memory, between vindictive and traumatic, of militancy and dictatorship. However, although to a lesser extent, in those films in addition to reflection and self-criticism about the actions that led to the failure of the revolutionary struggle, there is room for what the Italian historian Alessandro Portelli calls “disturbing memory.” This article examines and interprets, within the framework of reflections on testimony, similarities, and differences in the approach to traumatic and disturbing memories in the documentaries Errepé, by Gabriel Corvi and Gustavo de Jesús (Argentina, 2003), and Tempo de resistência, by André Ristum

Entre el exceso y la escasez. Testimonio y memoria en documentales sobre la militancia revolucionaria en Argentina y Brasil