English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Resumo: A partir da classica reflexao metacritica de Northrop Frye na “Introducao polemica” a sua Anatomia da critica (1957), na qual o autor defende uma concepcao de “critica como ciencia” contra a concepcao de “critica como literatura”, voltamo-nos para a recente reflexao metacritica de Ottmar Ette em SaberSobreViver: a (o)missao da filologia (2015), na qual o autor propoe uma “historia especializada das formas de escrita” nos Estudos Literarios que efetue “uma perspectivacao critica de sua tradicao”, visando a sua “reinvencao”. Relendo, em contraste com a leitura de Ette, as consideracoes metodologicas de Erich Auerbach em Mimesis (1946), apresentamos a concepcao de metodo-como-jogo como inerente a “competencia performativa” a ser promovida por uma nova formacao estetica ( Bildung ) no tempo presente. Palavras-chave: critica; tradicao; competencia performativa; formas de escrita; metodo-como-jogo; formacao estetica. Abstract:  From Northrop Frye’s classical metacritical reflections in the “Polemical introduction” of Anatomy of Criticism (1957), in which Frye defends a concept of “criticism as science” against the understanding of “criticism as literature”, we turned to the Ottmar Ette’s UberLebenswissen: die Aufgabe der Philologie (2004). In his recent metacritical reflections, the author proposes an “specialized history of writing forms” in Literary Studies, one that generates “a critical perspectivation of its tradition”, aiming at its “reinvention”. Rereading Erich Auerbach’s methodological considerations in Mimesis (1946), in contrast to Ette’s own reading of it, we present the concept of method-as-play perceived as something inherent to the “performative competence” to be developed by a new aesthetic formation ( Bildung ) at the present time. Keywords: criticism; tradition; performative competence; forms of writing; method-as-play; aesthetic formation.

Do passado como futuro da crítica: “competência performativa” e “formas de escrita” nos Estudos Literários