English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Resumen: El presente articulo tiene como objetivo analizar los topicos y las agresiones verbales que se presentaron en la convocatoria a la Marcha del 2 de abril de 2016 en Twitter y Facebook. Se estudia el discurso de protesta de dicha manifestacion a traves de sus esloganes, consignas y hashtags que hicieron parte de la convocatoria. Se evidencia el incremento de la tension a traves del registro discursivo de la violencia verbal y como esta intensifico la oposicion, la indignacion dando paso a la polarizacion directa mediante estrategias como la demonizacion. Desde una perspectiva discursiva con enfoque retorico y multimodal, se analiza el uso de la modalidad argumentativa de la polemica como una estrategia dominante en la confrontacion establecida por los opositores al gobierno y al Acuerdo de paz en Colombia. Se estudiaron los enunciados del discurso de protesta de una seleccion publicaciones en Twitter y Facebook del 1 febrero al 2 de abril. El analisis permite evidenciar la construccion del antagonismo y la oposicion al gobierno con una dimension violenta paradojicamente en un proceso de paz. Palabras clave: topicos; violencia verbal; discurso de protesta; argumentacion; polemica. Abstract: This paper aims to analyze the topics and verbal attacks that were presented in the call for the March on April 2, 2016 on Twitter and Facebook. It studies the protest discourse of this demonstration through its slogans, slogans and hashtags that were part of the call. It seeks to account for the increase in tension through the discursive record of verbal violence and how this intensified opposition, outrage and this gave way to direct polarization through strategies such as demonization. From a discursive perspective with a rhetorical and multimodal focus, the use of the argumentative modality of polemics is evidenced as a dominant strategy in the confrontation established by the opponents of the government and the Peace Agreement in Colombia. The statements of the protest speech were studied from a selection of publications on Twitter and Facebook from February 1 to April 2. The analysis allows for evidence of the construction of antagonism and opposition to the government with a violent dimension paradoxically in a peace process. Keywords: topics; verbal violence; protest speech; argumentation; polemics.

revista de estudos da linguagem

Tópicos y violencia verbal en la convocatoria a la marcha #NoMásDesgobierno en Colombia / Topics and verbal violence in the call to march #NoMásDesgobierno en Colombia