English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Resumo : O presente trabalho consiste na descricao e comparacao de dois softwares de analise lexical, o WordSmith Tools (WST) e o Sketch Engine (SE). O corpus de estudo selecionado para a realizacao da analise comparativa entre os programas denomina-se LexTest, e composto por artigos, dissertacoes, resenhas e teses da area da Lexicologia, escritos em lingua portuguesa, e apresenta 552.903 tokens . Os aspectos analisados no WST e no SE sao: interface, configuracao de linguas, upload de corpus , numero de tokens e types , etiquetagem do corpus , lista de palavras, lista de palavras-chave; acesso as linhas de concordância, entre outros. A partir das analises comparativas, foi possivel concluir que o WST e o SE sao eficazes no que se propoem, uma vez que, por exemplo, processam palavras-chave, permitem configurar a lingua conforme o corpus de estudo e calculam o numero de tokens de um corpus . Entretanto, dependendo do objetivo da pesquisa, um desses softwares pode ser mais apropriado que o outro. A escolha pela utilizacao de um deles e de responsabilidade do pesquisador, que podera consultar o quadro comparativo entre o WST e o SE apresentado no final deste artigo para fundamentar a sua preferencia. Palavras-chave : Linguistica de Corpus ; WordSmith Tools ; Sketch Engine . Abstract : The present work consists of the description and comparison of two lexical analysis software, WordSmith Tools (WST) and Sketch Engine (SE). The study corpus selected for the comparative analysis between the programs is called LexTest which is composed of articles, dissertations, reviews and theses about Lexicology. These texts are written in Portuguese, and the corpus has 552,903 tokens. The aspects analyzed in the WST and in the SE are: interface, language settings, corpus upload, number of tokens and types, corpus tagging, word list, keyword list, access to concordance lines, and so on. Based on the comparative analyzes, it was possible to conclude that the WST and the SE are effective in their purpose, because, for example, they process the keywords and allow configuring the language according to the study corpus and calculate the number of tokens; however, depending on the purpose of the research, one of these programs may be more appropriate than the other. The choice of one of them will be responsibility of the researcher, who may consult the comparative table between the WST and the SE, presented at the end of this paper to substantiate his or her preference. Keywords : Corpus Linguistics; WordSmith Tools; Sketch Engine.

revista de estudos da linguagem

Wordsmith Tools e Sketch Engine: um estudo analítico-comparativo para pesquisas científicas com uso de corpora / Wordsmith Tools and Sketch Engine: an analytical-comparative study for scientific research with corpora manipulation