English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Among the most basic references for the researchers of Turkish culture and literature in the Ottoman period are the tazkirah (collection of biographies) of shu’ara (poets), translations and sequels (dhayl) of Şakâ’iku’n-Nu‘mâniyye (Shaqa’iq al-Nu’maniyyah), biographical works listing the death dates of well-known persons (wafatnamah), some history books, works dealing with supernatural features and deeds of notable historical figures (manaqibnamah), and texts including the biographies (tarjama al-hal) of persons from various occupations. Of these, translations and sequels of Shaqa’iq al-Nu’maniyyah have particular importance. The first ring of this chain representing one of the most extensive genres of biographical works in Turkish cultural history is eş-Şakâ’iku’nNu‘mâniyye fî Ulemâi’d-Devleti’l-Osmâniye (al-Shaqaʾiq al-Nuʿmaniyyah fi ʿUlama al-Dawla al-ʿUthmaniyya) written in Arabic by Taşköprîzâde İsâmeddin Efendi. Having been highly favoured since it was written, this work was translated multiple times, and epitomes and sequels were written to it. Among the most famous ones of these are the translation by Edirneli Mecdî and the sequel (dhayl) by Nev‘îzâde Atâyî (Nev‘izadah Atayi). Furthermore, each of two contemporary Ottoman scholars who lived in the 18 century, Uşşâkîzâde Hasîb [Ushaqizadah Hasib] (d. 1724) and Şeyhî Mehmed Efendi [Sheikhi Mehmed Efendi] (d. 1732), wrote a sequel to the sequel by Nev‘îzâdah. The first one, the sequel by Ushaqizadah Hasib deals with the life stories of the persons having lived from 1633 to 1695 while the second one, the sequel by Sheikhî, contains the life stories of the persons having lived from 1633 and 1718. This paper aims to compare, in terms of context and contents, Zeyl-i Şakâ’ik (Dhayl al-Shaqa’iq) by Hasîb with Vekâyiü’l-Fuzalâ (Waqayi’ Al-Fudhala) by Sheikhî who stated that the former had incomplete and erroneous information and thus he re-wrote the wafatnamah (biographical work listing the dates of death of well-known persons) pertaining to the same period. The present study reveals the common and distinct features of both works, ∗ Bu makale, 15-17 Mayıs 2014 tarihlerinde Kayseri’de Prof. Dr. Hasibe Mazıoğlu hatırasına gerçekleştirilen “IX. Klâsik Türk Edebiyatı Sempozyumu”nda aynı adla sunulan tebliğin gözden geçirilmiş ve genişletilmiş hâlidir. ∗∗ (Dr.), Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü, Manisa/Türkiye, e-mail: ramazanekinci@hotmail.com Osmanlı Mirası Araştırmaları Dergisi / Journal of Ottoman Legacy Studies Cilt 3, Sayı 5, Mart 2016 / Volume 3, Issue 5, March 2016 Osmanlı Mirası Araştırmaları Dergisi (OMAD), Cilt 3, Sayı 5, Mart 2016, ss. 25-48. Journal of Ottoman Legacy Studies (JOLS), Volume 3, Issue 5, March 2016, pp. 25-48.

UŞŞÂKÎZÂDE HASÎB EFENDİ NİN ZEYL-İ ŞAKÂ İK I İLE ŞEYHÎ MEHMED EFENDİ NİN VEKÂYİ'Ü L-FUZALÂ SININ MUKAYESES