English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article analyzes the problem of public distrust in the objectivity of the conclusions of forensic psychiatric examinations. It is stated that this is due to the lack of adversarial nature of the parties in real practice. It is concluded that the introduction of the principle of adversarial nature of the parties between an expert psychiatrist and a specialist psychiatrist can significantly increase the objectivity and reasonability of forensic psychiatric conclusions, reduce public distrust in them and increase the credibility of forensic psychiatry.

Adversarial nature of the parties in the litigation, related to the assessment of mental health of participants