English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The problem of endometriosis terminology is discussed in the paper; the nosologic significance, expediency, and competence of use of the term «endometrioid disease» is shown. Clinicopathologic parallels are drawn by the example of the most frequent organ localizations of that pathology — adenomyosis, ovarian endometriosis, and extragenital endometriosis; the community of some components of pathogenesis, determining the process progress, clinical presentations, morphological structure of heterotopias, and directions of morphogenesis are shown. Introduction of the term «endometrioid disease» into practice determines the possibility to optimize the clinical and morphological diagnostics of endometriosis taking into account the organ localization, stage of the process, morphofunctional form, and directions of morphogenesis, which is necessary to select the adequate method of treatment and personal prognosis

On the nosologic significance and competence of use of the term «Endometrioid disease»