English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Resumo:  O presente estudo pretende analisar a relacao existente entre o raciocinio moral e o raciocinio juridico nos processos de tomada decisao dos Tribunais Constitucionais, objetivando solucionar o embate entre validade e legitimidade no exercicio da jurisdicao constitucional. Trata-se de pesquisa que faz uso do raciocinio hipotetico-dedutivo, valendo-se de dados de natureza primaria (acordaos e leis) e secundaria (entendimentos doutrinarios), permitindo concluir ser indispensavel a construcao de uma teoria nao meramente descritiva dos processos de tomada de decisao, mas analitico-hermeneutico-argumentativa, no sentido de ser capaz de fixar parâmetros para o julgador avaliar a correcao do raciocinio adotado na solucao de casos concretos, substituindo a arbitrariedade pela justificacao racional. Abstract:  This study examines the relationship between moral reasoning and legal reasoning in decision-making processes of Constitutional Courts. The aim is to establish parameters to understand how they occur, resolving the conflict between validity and legitimacy in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. This research makes use of hypothetical-deductive reasoning, drawing on primary (judgments and laws) and secondary data (doctrinal understandings). It concludes that it is essential to build not a merely descriptive theory of decision-making processes, but analytic-hermeneutic-argumentative, to be able to set parameters for the judge to assess the correctness of the reasoning adopted in the solution of a concrete case.

direito, estado e sociedade

Raciocínio Moral (Moral Reasoning) e Raciocínio Jurídico (Legal Reasoning) no Exercício da Jurisdição Constitucional / Moral Reasoning and Legal Reasoning in the Exercise of Constitutional Jurisdiction