English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Current analysis recalculates standard semi-amateur enteral diets given in a handout for Home Enteral Nutrition Therapy. Diets with 1,500, 1,800 and 2,100 kcal were selected. Three softwares for diet calculation were employed, namely, Program A, B, C, and a manual calculation, with the help of three bibliographical references. Diet 1,500 kcal of Program A had a non-adequacy percentage of -22.62%; Program B featured -13.9%; Program C featured +15.73%; manual calculation featured -1.1%. Diet 1,800 kcal features -6.6% in Program A; -15.6% in Program B; +11.17% in Program C; and -1.8% in manual calculation. Diet 2,100 kcal of Program A featured -25.5%; Program B featured -15.8%; Program C featured +7.2%; manual calculation featured -4.8%. Analysis showed unfeasibility of diets with Programs A, B and C. Manual calculation was the method that was closest to values of calorie calculation presented in the guideline.

COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE TRÊS SOFTWARES DE CÁLCULO DE DIETAS: UMA ANÁLISE DO VALOR ENERGÉTICO DE UMA DIETA ENTERAL SEMIARTESANAL