EBÛ L-HASEN ES-SİNDÎ NİN BİRGİVÎ NİN ESERİNE YAZDIĞI MENHELÜ L-HÜDÂT İLÂ MU'ADDİLİ S-SALÂT ADLI ŞERHİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE TA'DÎL-İ ERKÂN KAVRAMI

This article aims to examine the concept of ta'dil-i erkan in the context of Birgivi's famous work Muaddili's-Salat (v. 981/1573) and Abu’l-Hasan b. Muhammed Sadık es-Sindi’s (1125-1187 / 1713-1773) commentary on this work Menhelü’l-hüdat. Birgivi wrote this treatise to criticize the view accepted by his denomination and the people of his time and to emphasize the concept of tadil-i erkan. It is one of the goals of writing this treatise to show that the itmi’nan is the wisdom in kavme and celse as it is in the rüku and secde. Abu’lHasan es-Sindi, one of the leading scholars of a group of scholars in Medina, who educated the leaders and teachers of the 18th century reform movement, commented this work to defend his views on taʻdil-i erkan. This name asserted that it is assumed to taʻdil-i erkan in ruku and secde. This view is contrary to both the basic view of the denomination and the provision of Birgivî. In addition to being a Hanafi faqih, as well as being a notorious name for his studies on the study of the hadith, Abu’l-Hasan es-Sindi discussed this issue within the framework of his approach towards comparing the views of the sect with the authentic narrations. It can be said that she wrote a comprehensive commentary on taʻdil-i erkan. One of the main objectives of this study is to examine the contributions and criticisms of Abu’l-Hasan es-Sindi. It is thought that this study will make a small contribution to the day-to-day exposures of these cases, which are still in a state of writing and can be detected in a small number of writing copies. A study on this work, which is included in the juridical studies of the Babur’s period, is important in terms of showing the rich heritage of this period.