English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In one of the recent additions to the IS identity and diversity discussion, Alter [2003] questions the definition and relevance of “IT artifact” as defined by Benbasat and Zmud [2003]. In terms of definition, we believe that there is no substantial difference between Alter’s work system construct and IT artifact. However, when it comes to enhancing the relevance of and guiding the diversity in IT research, Alter’s boundary based approach may be less powerful than a core, IT-artifact based approach. Alter’s focus on systems, nonetheless, has it merits and therefore we suggest a possible convergence of Alter and Benbasat and Zmud’s constructs.

The IS Core - VI: Further Along the Road to the IT Artifact