English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Community decisions are more frequently on the agenda, than researchers of decision making processes should guess. Which methodology might be used, when background ex- perts have diverging opinion, when members of the community neglect „rational" arguments and processes, but ask for dernocratic voting? Leaders of ministries, self-governing bodies have limited time for certain decisions like building a new waste-collecting center, a huge radar antennae, a new airport in the neighborhood of a settlement. The problem area mentioned here is a telecommunication development of a new Israeli city, Modi'in, where decision makers used a special compromising method, the „muddling through" decision making process to have a satisfying (but, for sure, not optimal) solution, together with the regional community opinion leaders, expert groups, investors and authorities.

„Not In My Back Yard” – közösségi döntések, technológia, városfejlődés