English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the treatment results and stability of open bite treatment achieved via intrusion of posterior teeth and extraction of 1 st premolars Material and Methods: This study was conducted on pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2) and follow-up (T3) cephalograms of 28 patients who received open bite treatment. 14 patients (mean age 14.61±0.87) were treated with extraction of the 1 st premolar (extraction group: EG) while 14 patients (mean age 15.06±1.05) had bite closure via intrusion of the posterior teeth using mini-implants (mini-implant group: MG). The mean follow-up periods in EG and MG were 3.32±1.25 (range, 2.10-6.20) and 2.74±0.77 years (range, 2.05-4.34), respectively. Results: At T2, SNB increased and SNGoGn decreased significantly in MG with significant intergroup difference (p 0.05).  Klinik olarak onemli relaps oranlari mini-implant ve cekim gruplarinda sirasi ile %7.14 (1 kisi) ve %14.28 (2 kisi) olarak belirlendi. Sonuc: Mini-implantlarla intruzyon ve cekimli tedaviler farkli yollarla acik kapanisin tedavinde basarili olsa da, her iki grubun takip surecinde relaps egilimleri benzer bulunmustur. Anahtar Kelimeler: acik kapanis, dis cekimi, dis gomulmesi

EVALUATION OF TREATMENT RESULTS AND STABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH ANTERIOR OPEN BITE TREATED BY PREMOLAR EXTRACTIONS OR MINI-IMPLANT ANCHORED INTRUSION