English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: This article presents as a general theme the results of the  analysis of arguments of Brazilian Federal Supreme Court’s Justices in lawsuits about medicines not registered in Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. Methodology: It is constituted of a comparative case study of the Justices’ votes, in which it is pointed out the similarities and divergences in two extraordinary appeals’ judgments. Results: It was found that there were differences on the issue of the dispensation of non-standardized medications by SUS. Conclusion: The Justices considered the protection of Brazilian population health in relation to the risks by highlighting the importance of having the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency’ registration, because that grants better reliability.

Fornecimento de medicamentos não registrados na Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária: o discurso de ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal