English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Public participation in administrative decision-makings has enjoyed a specific legal status in rule of law of developed countries, which usually adjusts the public participation scope and the participation rights via enacting unified administrative procedural laws or special legislations. The new issues faced by China in ruling the country by law and administrative rule of law confronts how its public participation in administrative rule of law will be constructed via administrative system of law. The public participation in administrative decision-makings usually involves three core issues: the first is the scope of administrative decision-makings that the public can participate in; the second is the ways and methods of public participation in administrative decision-makings; the third is the administrative relief of public participation in administrative decision-makings, which requires us to reconstruct it by systems of administrative law accordingly. We believe that it is essential to construct systems such as a category of rights of administrative relative persons, contents of administrative procedures, administrative decision norms and administrative relief.

Administrative Rule of Law in Public Participation in Administrative Decision-makings