English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this article, we investigated the shock phenomenon in gas pipeline systems. We particularly address the numerical discrepancies introduced when using a primitive variable-based formulation of the compressible gas flow model. For the analysis, we compared two different schemes, namely, van Leer’s second-order Monotonic Upstream-centered Scheme for Conservation Laws scheme (TVD-MUSCL) together with Roe’s superbee slope limiter and the fifth-order accurate finite volume weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme (WENO5-Z). For the numerical flux, we implemented the Rusanov solver. The time stepping was done with a strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta method. The method of manufactured solutions was used to verify the code accuracy. Based on a series of numerical experiments, we showed that the local errors become more visible if we use the WENO5-Z reconstruction. MSC 2010: 74H15, 76N15

Numerical discrepancies of using a nonconservative formulation of the compressible gas flow model