English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: Various auditory evoked potential techniques have been explored as a means of objectively predicting the behavioral audiogram in groups of subjects who cannot provide reliable or accurate behavioral results. The tone-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) cannot differentiate between severe and profound SNHL, whereas the auditory steady state response (ASSR) can provide threshold information in a frequency-specific manner at intensity levels of 120 dBSPL. The cortical auditory evoked potential (N1P2 CAEP) has shown advantages over the ABR and ASSR.

COMPARISON OF N1P2 CORTICAL AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL AND NARROW-BAND CHIRP AUDITORY STEADY STATE POTENTIAL IN HEARING THRESHOLD DETECTION IN ADULTS