English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A few years ago I was approached by a fellow researcher who had read one of my manuscripts. She was a bit upset with me, pointing out that she had published a paper on the same topic a few years before and I had not referenced her work in my article, therefore not recognizing that she was the source of the key concept expressed in the paper. I explained that I had never read her article, so must have come up with the same idea on my own. I then read and referenced her work in my paper. We remain friends. This event led me to consider: How often is knowledge “re-invented”?

Invention and Re-invention of Knowledge