English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The increased application of Emotional Intelligence (EI) in psychology warrants clarification of conceptualization and measurement approaches. Two predominant measures of EI, the Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) and the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQi), were compared with bivariate and factor analysis techniques. The absence of common factor structures, pattern of low subtest correlations, and distinct relations to cognitive reasoning suggest that the instruments measure significantly different constructs. It would be erroneous to assume that EI is one unified concept. Implications are that counseling psychologists be aware of the distinct models of EI in order to coordinate effective assessment and interventions.

Which Emotional Intelligence? A Comparison of Measures and Implications for Counseling Psychology