English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Fukuyama’s  thesis  about  “the  end  of  history”  is  controversial.  History  is  not  an  ideology.  History  cannot  be  ended,  if  by history we mean the past, which we remember and interpret for the purpose of orientating ourselves in the present and the future.  Fukuyama  has  a  right  to  declare  the  victory  of  liberal  democracy,  but  other  political  ideologies  have  not  become extinct. If we look at the thesis of the “end of history” from a scientific point of view, then we can conclude that such a thing is impossible:  for  after  the  “end  of  history”,  history  continues.  Therefore,  there  is  no  real  end  to  history.  It  is  continuing  a quarter of a century after  the Fukyama’s  thesis was published. Even  if we can accept  the thesis of  the end of history as an ideology,  we  still  cannot  accept  the  end  of  philosophy.  Phenomenology,  Critical  Realism,  Existentialist  Philosophy, Hermeneutics, Structuralism, etc. are just some of the evidence that contemporary philosophy continues to exist and evolve, despite the rising and falling of various ideologies in the twentieth century and the early twenty‐first century. This can also be said about art, culture, and history as a science.

The History Continues: Reflections About the Theory of the End of History From Francis Fukuyama