English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Among scholars and critics of literature, it is widely believed that the earliest period of writing, the ancient period, is characterized by collective literature and the anonymity it produces, and that little importance was attached to the author, who, if acknowledged at all, was considered inconsequential. However, starting from the 17th and 18th centuries, this began to change and authors were given the position of greatest prominence in the study of literature and its significance, while collective writing disappeared altogether, that is, until the advent of The Death of the Author and the Internet, which re-established collectivism and anonymity (the Wikipedia as a case in point). The question that we need to ask is: Does this approach conform with reality or is it merely a convenient generalization?

Rumors About the Death of the Author Have Been Exaggerated: Between Collectivism and Individuality in the Middle Ages