English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The issue of this study continues the analysis of persuasive truth (the “truth” of beliefs), a problem debated by us in several articles already published, especially in two of them: Doxastic Dialectics (1999) and The Probable and the Problem (2010). In this new “chapter,” our intention is to develop more details from the perspective of subjectivity, which has a grounding role in doxastic dialectics. Doxa’s axiomatic mechanism tries to temper the subjective dimension of persuasive truth, by submitting the doxastic proofs to the control of the oppositional principle (=antithetic “reasoning”). Doxastic thinking discovers dialectically its own ratio (=measure), progressively increasing the relevance of the listening capacity. In the text that follows, the concept of listening is used in a larger than sensitive sense, being equivalent to condition of receptivity.

Listening and the Well-tempered Controversy (With Reference to Intercultural Exchange)