English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The Birds and Habitats Directives are the cornerstones of EU nature conservation law, aiming at the conservation of the Natura 2000 network, a network of protected sites under these directives, and the protection of species. The protection regime for these sites and species is not absolute: member states may, under certain conditions, allow plan or projects that can have an adverse impact on nature. In this case, compensatory measures can play an important role in safeguarding the Natura 2000 network and ensuring the survival of the protected species. This contribution analyses whether taking compensatory measures is always obligatory, and discusses the aim and the characteristics (i.a. the naturalness) of compensatory measures, in relation to other kinds of measures such as mitigation measures, usual nature conservation measures, and former nature development measures, and to the assessment of the adverse impact caused by the plan or project and of the alternative solutions. The questions will be discussed in light of the text of the legislation, the guidance and practice by the European Commission, (legal) doctrine and case law, mainly of the Court of Justice (the Briels case and the Acheloos River case).

COMPENSATORY MEASURES IN EUROPEAN NATURE CONSERVATION LAW: A STATE-OF-THEART AFTER THE BRIELS CASE AND THE ACHELOOS RIVER CASE