English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The study carried out for the 317.4 article of the code of criminal procedure begins with a brief comment on the inadmissibility of applying a grammatical interpretation of the text, to then go on the shelves of the Congress in order to find the spirit of the law in regards to deadlines to accuse and having to do with the regime of freedom. With equal end you come to principles of constitutional interpretation and technique that implements the test of proportionality. This analysis contains the different modifications that has suffered the article 317 to date, and shows the gradual increase of the procedural terms of the articles under analysis; It also unraveled the mistake made by the legislator in the last three reforms to article 317, which fades the sense of the law the legal text making incoherent.

Libertad por vencimiento del término para acusar: una interpretación ajustada a principios constitucionales