English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEl pensamiento de Foucault es una caja de herramientas que ha sido utilizada de muy diversos modos. Estas diferentes aplicaciones, sin embargo, no significan que su reflexion carezca de unidad. Para dar razon de esta afirmacion este articulo realiza una reevaluacion integral de la obra de Foucault centrada en la gubernamentalidad y muestra las articulaciones que dan razon de los principales poderes analizados por el pensador frances: soberano, disciplinario, biopolitico estatal y biopolitico (neo)liberal. El paso de unas tecnologias de poder a otras no implica que haya eras ni que los poderes desaparezcan. Lo que cambia es su prevalencia. El texto estudiara las diferencias del poder disciplinar y el biopoder, la transformacion del poder disciplinario en biopoder estatal y la conversion de este en (neo)liberalismo. EnglishFoucault’s thought is a toolbox which has been used in a variety of ways. Those multiple uses, do not imply, however, that his philosophy lacks unity. In order to ground this assertion, this article performs a comprehensive re-assessment of the work of Foucault, focused on the notion of governmentality, and it discusses how the main powers analyzed by the French thinker are related: sovereign power, disciplinary power, state biopolitics, and (neo) liberal biopolitics. Passing from certain power technologies to others does not entail the existence of eras of power or the disappearance of powers. What changes is their prevalence. This study analyzes the differences between disciplinary power and biopower, the transformation of disciplinary power into state power and the transformation of this latter into (neo)liberalism.

La gubernamentalidad biopolítica: de la sociedad de control estatal al liberalismo