English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives of the study were to examine alternative measures of growth potential of bulls in testing stations, determine whether genetic parameter estimates of such traits changed over time, and exam - ine whether existing methods for performance testing were appropriate. Records from 1980 to 2010 of 44 425 Fleckvieh bulls in Czech progeny testing stations were analyzed. The following traits were examined: weight at the beginning of the test (150 th day of age) , weight at the end of the test (530 th day of age), gain from birth to the beginning of the test, and gain during the test. Fixed effects in five multi-trait animal models were station- year-season groups, linear and quadratic regressions on age, and regression on heterozygosity (proportion of an individual's loci with alleles from different ancestor breeds). Random effects included additive genetic, per - manent environment, and residual variances. Separate analyses were conducted in four consecutive time peri - ods (1980-1987, 1988-1992, 1993-1997, and 1998-2010). Across these time intervals, estimates of additive genetic variance decreased for all of the traits, while estimates of residual variances increased. In consequence, heritability estimates for all of the traits decreased over time. This decrease was most apparent for gain during the test, for which heritability declined by more than 50% over the course of the study. Results demonstrate that over three decades, the system of testing came into conflict with genetic improvement of the breed, possibly because the measured traits changed genetically over the course of selection. Regular analysis of the recorded data, re-estimation of genetic parameters in relation to time, and appropriate modification of existing methods of rearing/fattening in station tests are required. When such inspections are neglected, data from the testing stations may not accurately reflect genetic merit of individual animals. Meat production has an important role in the breeding of dual-purpose cattle breeds. For genetic evaluation of meat yield, several types of informa - tion can be used, including data from performance testing stations, records from progeny tests (station or field), and measurements taken at slaughter. Reliability and usefulness of results is dependent upon testing environments and procedures. Field tests may provide substantial numbers of records, but data may be less reliable than from testing stations due to greater variation in management. Alternatively, testing stations may provide more uniform management and more reliable record - ing but produce fewer records. Organization and rearing conditions of any test should allow the expression of genetic variance in the population. Several sources of information are available for the evaluation of meat production in the Czech Republic: performance testing stations, progeny testing sta - tions, and field testing in which data are collected on commercial cattle farms (the SEUROP system). Progeny testing stations were designed to estimate genetic merit for growth of progeny-tested sires (Czech Fleckvieh) and have standardized terms and methodological procedures (see www.cestr.cz/files/ pokyny_a_formulare_pk/metodika_masa.pdf ). The analytical method for evaluation is the multi-trait animal model, the traits being net gain (calculated

Changes over time in genetic parameters for growth in bulls and assessment of suitability of test methods