English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Most analyses of Semitic languages use a root-and-pattern approach to account for non‐concatenative morphology, but this analysis of Semitic languages (i.e, triconsonantal roots) has recently become a subject of debate (cf. e.g, Ussishkin, 2006; Shimron, 2003; and references therein). This debate can be summed up as an opposition between the observed facts of the language, which seem to support an elegant and simple root-and-pattern approach which takes the abstract root as a lexeme, and the desire to use linguistic universals to account for the data in a less language-family-specific way based on whole words as lexemes. Amharic, an Ethio‐Semitic language of Ethiopia, has been analyzed with the root-and-pattern method, just like other Semitic languages. A word-based account, however, which does not refer to an abstract underlying root in derivations, will be shown to be a superior analysis for the reduplicative verb form in Amharic; in this case, the word-based account is both elegant and relatively simple. Under a root-and-pattern analysis, the Amharic reduplicative verb is usually described as a reduplication of the second consonantal radical (C2) with the vowel /a/. Leslau (2007) states:

Amharic Internal Reduplication and Foot Structure: A Word-Based Approach