English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

intensional objects; that is, objects like properties, relations, and numbers 2 This is not all he believes them to be, of course, but at least part. The translation I have worked from is Cornford's. 1 Some of the especially pertinent literature includes Gregory Vlastos, 'The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides", The Philosophical Review, voLLXUl, no.3 (1954); Wilfrid Sellars, "Vlastos and the Third Man", Philosophical Review, voLLXIV, no.3 (1955); P.T. Geach, 'The Third Man Again", Philosophical Review, vol.LXV (1956); and Colin Strang, "Plato and the Third Man", reprinted in Plato I: Metaphysics and Epistemology, (ed. G. Vlastos, Notre Dame, 1971). 2 R.E. Allen says that this is the generally accepted view, although he himself disagrees with it. See his "Participation and Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues", reprinted in Plato I, ibid, p.177. Also compare Vlastos, "Postscript to the Third Man: A Reply to Mr. Geach", Philosophical Review, vol.LXV (1956), p.90, and Lynne Spellman, "Patterns and Copies: The Auslegung, Vol. 17, No. 1

The Recurring Problem of the Third Man