English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The entrenchment of a Bill of Rights in a supreme Constitution in South Africa means that constitutionalism will become central in a new emerging jurisprudence.  The constitutional requirement that the courts promote “the values which underlie an open and democratic society based on freedom and equality 2  implies that the interpretive task will be radically different from what it was under the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty.  The duty imposed on the courts by section 39(1)(a) and 7(1) will compel them to make value choices and to make those values explicit through clear and transparent articulation.

The significance of a philosophical approach in constitutional adjudication with reference to the Prince case