English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Recent progress in the fight against terrorism seem s to be the reason of the decline of political crimes invocation in the field of the extradition a d in the International Refugee Law. The prohibitio n of the exception of political crime in extradition and terrorism treaties supposes the rejection of any t ype of justification, including the political ones, for ac ts qualified as terrorists. However, the doubts tha t States maintain about the notion and the universal scope o f the contemporary incrimination of the terrorism a nd the diverse practice of the States in front of the invocation of political crimes, as well as recent c ases such as Snowden’s in the United States, Battisti's in Br azil or Falciani’s in Spain, suggest that the notio n f political crime could be still in force and in some cases necessary. PALABRAS CLAVE: extradición, asilo, terrorismo, derechos humanos, libertad de expresión, delito político, ACNUR.

¿Qué queda del delito político en el Derecho Internacional contemporáneo? (Observaciones en los ámbitos de la extradición y del asilo)