English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The present article of investigation reveals the way in which the Supreme Court of Justice, Criminal Chamber of our Country, has been studying the principle of congruence and its extension, to the imputation hearing, delimiting in what aspects it should keep consistency the issuance of the sentence even from the imputation hearing, taking into account that within the so-called accusatory system, which has its roots in the North American system, this hearing does not stand as substantial in the implementation of this procedural system. In this way, the work aims to expose the normative approaches and line of jurisprudence that the Supreme Court of Justice has been developing through the enforcement of Law 906 of 2004.

justicia

Variación fáctica y jurídica luego de formulada la imputación en el sistema procesal colombiano de la ley 906 de 2004, antes de la acusación. Aspectos normativos y jurisprudenciales