English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The goal of this study was to know if Spanish children with high scores in positive affect (PA) had statistically significant differences with the students with low scores in PA in the six dimensions that formed the language area of the academic attributions (Success: ability, effort and external causes; Failure: ability, effort and external causes). The sample was formed by 862 students, between 8 and 11 years old. The language subscale of the Sydney Attribution Scale (SAS) and the positive affect subscale of the short version of the Positive And Negative Affect Schedule for Children (PANAS-C) were used. The Student T-test showed that participants with high levels of PA significantly had higher means in language attributions to success and failure due to external causes. On the other hand, students with low scores in PA significantly obtained higher means in language attributions to failure due to ability and effort. These results widen the previous existing literature and give the opportunity to make bigger the field of affect and academic attributions.

Diferencias en las atribuciones académicas en Lengua en base al Afecto Positivo