English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The transcription of oralinterviews into textual data is a complex process. Translating spoken languagewith all its extralinguistic features into some sort of written textpresentation – through transcribing it – is time-consuming and fraught withethical, methodological and theoretical issues. This article’s argument istwo-fold: first, it calls for more transparency from researchers in explainingwhat happens on the way from interview to published text. There are many waysto transcribe, and they fit different purposes. We should be clear as to why wechoose different methods. Second, it argues that our disciplines as well as ourreaders would benefit from us allowing more space to the researcher intranscribed interviews.

Disclosing the Interviewer: Ethnopoetics and the Researcher's Place in Transcribed Interviews