English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article considers whether ‘comic contracts’, which incorporate aspects of visualisation, are legally valid under Anglo-Australian contract law. Comic contracting has been put forward as one method which can address issues associated with traditional text-based contracting, including contractor apathy and illiteracy. Use cases across a variety of commercial and other contexts are arising in Australia and around the world. The literature has to date focussed upon the advantages and disadvantages of this novel method, however the broader question of whether comic contracts are legally valid in light of their potential uncertainties has gone unanswered. This article ultimately makes the case for validity and suggests there is ample authority supporting the notion that a comic contract can satisfy the legal test of contractual certainty.

Picture-Perfect or Potentially Perilous? Assessing the Validity of ‘Comic Contracts’