English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This essay engages in a reading of Tina Darragh’s publication Opposable Dumbs (2010). This reading is carried out in pursuit of a number of critical and theoretical questions, that include asking what sort of text this is, and how we might read it. The essay considers how Darragh’s work connects to the debate around open source and free software, and to the politics and poetics of that debate. Taking up the call for creative responses in Darragh’s anti-rights or inverted copyright statement, the writing takes a route through the text that parallels some of Darragh’s strategies as a writer. This creative reading is linked to a reading of Stephen Voyce’s essay on open source poetics (2011), with some reference to a wider discourse around FLOSS, creative commons, and copyleft strategies. This essay proposes Darragh’s work as a case study for Voyce’s proposals, and suggests that her practice may in fact go further than he proposes in moving from a position of ‘open source’ to one of ‘open content.’

Apologies for Blanks or Laments for Dumbness: Tina Darragh’s <i>Opposable Dumbs</i> as Open Source and/or Open Content