English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Materials and Methods: Sixty patients from both sexes were diagnosed with CLBP, aged 30 to 60 years and were divided randomly into two equal groups with thirty patients in each group; group A received conventional therapy that include (infrared, ultrasound, stretch and strength exercises for back and abdominal muscles) and group B received positional release technique. The treatment sessions were applied 3 days per week for 6 weeks. The pain was measured by Visual Analogue Scale, the lumbar range of motion was measured by Inclinometer and Functional disability was measured by Oswestry disability scale. Measurements were taken at two intervals pretreatment and post treatment.

CONVENTIONAL THERAPY VERSUS POSITIONAL RELEASE TECHNIQUE IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC LOW BACK DYSFUNCTION